Fractal Softworks Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Starsector 0.97a is out! (02/02/24); New blog post: Anubis-class Cruiser (12/20/24)

Pages: 1 [2] 3

Author Topic: [0.97a] Postmodern Carriers  (Read 17990 times)

Android9k

  • Ensign
  • *
  • Posts: 30
    • View Profile
Re: [0.97a] Postmodern Carriers
« Reply #15 on: November 29, 2024, 11:18:38 PM »

The issue still puzzles me, but it has been fixed. Swarm core should properly detect modules now.
Logged

EnigmaniteZ

  • Commander
  • ***
  • Posts: 160
    • View Profile
Re: [0.97a] Postmodern Carriers
« Reply #16 on: November 30, 2024, 06:52:25 PM »

umm...update checker says latest version is 1.0.4a, but the download link is to 1.0.4? guess you forgot to set the mod version before you packed it up?
Logged
Also known as: Khe, Kherae. Pros: tend to be an optimizer and a fixer. Cons: ADD (Is that a squirrel over there?) and severe memory issues (as in: I'm the last 10+ years)

Dear fellow coders: please use more null checks...

Android9k

  • Ensign
  • *
  • Posts: 30
    • View Profile
Re: [0.97a] Postmodern Carriers
« Reply #17 on: November 30, 2024, 07:05:09 PM »

umm...update checker says latest version is 1.0.4a, but the download link is to 1.0.4? guess you forgot to set the mod version before you packed it up?
Nope, I definitely uploaded the latest version.
Logged

EnigmaniteZ

  • Commander
  • ***
  • Posts: 160
    • View Profile
Re: [0.97a] Postmodern Carriers
« Reply #18 on: November 30, 2024, 08:56:18 PM »

odd. when I posted that, i'd just downloaded and it was 104. but now it's 104a. ah well, fixed now. probably weird caching issue...
Logged
Also known as: Khe, Kherae. Pros: tend to be an optimizer and a fixer. Cons: ADD (Is that a squirrel over there?) and severe memory issues (as in: I'm the last 10+ years)

Dear fellow coders: please use more null checks...

lachev

  • Ensign
  • *
  • Posts: 2
    • View Profile
Re: [0.97a] Postmodern Carriers
« Reply #19 on: December 01, 2024, 04:21:23 AM »

I’m unable to download the file because it’s being flagged as a virus. I’ve tried using Chrome, Edge, and Firefox, but the issue persists.
Logged

Shinr

  • Commander
  • ***
  • Posts: 101
    • View Profile
Re: [0.97a] Postmodern Carriers
« Reply #20 on: December 01, 2024, 05:31:13 AM »

I’m unable to download the file because it’s being flagged as a virus. I’ve tried using Chrome, Edge, and Firefox, but the issue persists.

Same here, Defender thinks it is a trojan.
Logged

Android9k

  • Ensign
  • *
  • Posts: 30
    • View Profile
Re: [0.97a] Postmodern Carriers
« Reply #21 on: December 01, 2024, 06:28:15 AM »

I’m unable to download the file because it’s being flagged as a virus. I’ve tried using Chrome, Edge, and Firefox, but the issue persists.

Same here, Defender thinks it is a trojan.

These are false-positives that may be caused by a couple of my classes: "AceFighterGlowingEffectListener" and "ShieldDisposeListener". What I think is happening is that it just sees the word "Listener" and associates it with network activity. You can find an analysis of the jar here: https://hybrid-analysis.com/sample/9196c37e65e8515240e2887c5b508042f54190eda07513826ccd98f984fd8970
Logged

Android9k

  • Ensign
  • *
  • Posts: 30
    • View Profile
Re: [0.97a] Postmodern Carriers
« Reply #22 on: December 01, 2024, 06:42:33 AM »

Could both of you try redownloading it? I made an adjustment to those names and hopefully the false-positive is taken care of.
Logged

Shinr

  • Commander
  • ***
  • Posts: 101
    • View Profile
Re: [0.97a] Postmodern Carriers
« Reply #23 on: December 01, 2024, 09:58:42 AM »

Could both of you try redownloading it? I made an adjustment to those names and hopefully the false-positive is taken care of.

No, still gives red lags before getting auto-deleted.

Guess I have to get it on the Defender's whitelist.
Logged

Android9k

  • Ensign
  • *
  • Posts: 30
    • View Profile
Re: [0.97a] Postmodern Carriers
« Reply #24 on: December 01, 2024, 10:05:57 AM »

That's really annoying. For what it's worth I've had this mod on USC since 11/22 and on corvus since 11/06, and this is the first I'm hearing of any such warnings.
Logged

lachev

  • Ensign
  • *
  • Posts: 2
    • View Profile
Re: [0.97a] Postmodern Carriers
« Reply #25 on: December 01, 2024, 10:17:33 AM »

Could both of you try redownloading it? I made an adjustment to those names and hopefully the false-positive is taken care of.

I ended up disabling my Windows anti-virus (the realtime protection) and managed to download it. I also tried to re-download again after enabling the protection, but got the same issue. Anyway, I have the file now. Cheers!
Logged

Shinr

  • Commander
  • ***
  • Posts: 101
    • View Profile
Re: [0.97a] Postmodern Carriers
« Reply #26 on: December 01, 2024, 10:51:09 AM »

Good news, downloaded again and the Defender did not make a fuss this time.
Logged

Android9k

  • Ensign
  • *
  • Posts: 30
    • View Profile
Re: [0.97a] Postmodern Carriers
« Reply #27 on: December 04, 2024, 11:03:47 PM »

A couple of notes regarding 1.0.5 I'll add to the lunaconfig menu in the next update:

`Regroup Ratio` does not take bombers into account for the purpose of measuring lost fighters, `Bomber Regroup Toggle` is what controls carrier regrouping behavior regarding bombers. However, it's important to note that in 'mixed role' carriers `Regroup Ratio` will cause bombers to regroup if their escorts take enough losses to cross the specified threshold.

The term 'lost' refers to wing members that are either destroyed or 'returning'.
« Last Edit: December 04, 2024, 11:07:26 PM by Android9k »
Logged

moeren

  • Ensign
  • *
  • Posts: 13
    • View Profile
Re: [0.97a] Postmodern Carriers
« Reply #28 on: December 06, 2024, 06:12:53 AM »

Just found this threat. Great that you keep  the mod alive. Just a shame that Fighter Bay Standardization is gone. It may have been OP, but i love it.
Logged

KHM

  • Ensign
  • *
  • Posts: 2
    • View Profile
Re: [0.97a] Postmodern Carriers
« Reply #29 on: December 14, 2024, 04:00:21 PM »

Hi, thx for the update of this great mod!  ;D

I find that, when either my fleet or the enemy install any "fighter armor removal" hullmod on any of the ships, the game CTD.
I test on the simulator with different loadouts, try all kinds of wings, and that hullmod always end in a CTD

Any help is hugely appreciated  :'(

My log of the last crash, it reads:
[Thread-3] ERROR com.fs.starfarer.combat.CombatMain  - java.lang.NullPointerException
java.lang.NullPointerException
   at com.fs.starfarer.loading.specs.HullVariantSpec.hasDMods(Unknown Source)
   at com.fs.starfarer.codex.CodexData.Object(Unknown Source)
   at com.fs.starfarer.codex.CodexData.<init>(Unknown Source)
   at com.fs.starfarer.codex.oOOO.<init>(Unknown Source)
   at com.fs.starfarer.codex.oOOO.?00000(Unknown Source)
   at com.fs.starfarer.loading.ResourceLoaderState.init(Unknown Source)
   at com.fs.state.AppDriver.begin(Unknown Source)
   at com.fs.starfarer.combat.CombatMain.main(Unknown Source)
   at com.fs.starfarer.StarfarerLauncher.super(Unknown Source)
   at com.fs.starfarer.StarfarerLauncher$1.run(Unknown Source)
   at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3