For the love of... I play these games to get away from my day job as a physicist.
Iscariot, you are not defending basic science. You are defending the 'We know everything and nothing can change' viewpoint, which is, just in my personal opinion, the OPPOSITE of basic science. Consider the following:
Newtonian mechanics (also known as Newton's 1st, 2cd, and 3rd Laws) works incredibly well to describe the world as we know it. For hundreds of years it held as the laws of how things moved. Then along came a good description of electromagnetics and lo and behold it predicted a finite speed of light that did not respect classical invariant transforms. Paradox and hilarity ensue. Experiment and later Einstein show that in fact Newton was only
mostly right, because space and time are not flat things which we just occupy. An interesting note is that Newton actually knew that this was a problem! He just had no data to go farther.
The laws of physics change
IF there is experimental data that requires them to change. Often the theories that come to fit the new data predict amazing things, which we then realize.
Personally I don't think we are going to have FTL drives and all that, but not for lack of hope
