Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Aklyon]

Version Checker is mentioning malformed JSON in the remote version file for SRA.

[Bastion.Systems]

Is it intended that every Morningstar comes with a converted hangar modification?

[Euripides]

There's two versions of the Seski class but they are both the exact same.

[MShadowy]

Cloned organs are sold on open market on Euripides but you can't buy them because "illegal to trade on open market here".

Yeah, I dunno what's up with that; I'll take a look at the commodities.

Is it intended that every Morningstar comes with a converted hangar modification?

Yeah, the hullmod is built-in.

Version Checker is mentioning malformed JSON in the remote version file for SRA.

Hmmm, something to take a look at.

There's two versions of the Seski class but they are both the exact same.

Right now that's as intended; the Seksi is so fragile that making it worse with the Civilian mods hullmod seemed needlessly cruel.  I'm intending to change the cream colored skins to Persean League modded hulls, which will boost armor and health in exchange for reduced flux stats and switch out offensive energy slots with Ballistic slots while retaining energy for pd purposes.

[Wriath]

Having some kind of crash on initial start, tried only running SRA, graphicslib, lazylib. not sure specifically what part of starfarer.log will troubleshoot that though.

edit; disabled most of the graphicslib options per the 'mod troubleshooting guide' and it worked, 64 bit os, 16 gigs ram, and a radeon 7800... doesn't seem like I should have any trouble running this 0_o

[Aklyon]

Having some kind of crash on initial start, tried only running SRA, graphicslib, lazylib. not sure specifically what part of starfarer.log will troubleshoot that though.

edit; disabled most of the graphicslib options per the 'mod troubleshooting guide' and it worked, 64 bit os, 16 gigs ram, and a radeon 7800... doesn't seem like I should have any trouble running this 0_o

Do you have vmparams and 64-bit java setup correctly?

[Toxcity]

Small thing, it seems that none of the ships have any Autofit variants to go off of.

[grinningsphinx]

Is the kobold support fighter supposed 18,000 base Its more expensive then Tridents.....

[MShadowy]

Already been brought to my attention.  Currently all SRA fighters are a little too pricey, but they've already been brought down to be more line with vanilla in the dev version; I'm currently working on some new content for the next release, so the fix will have to wait til then.

Small thing, it seems that none of the ships have any Autofit variants to go off of.

Right, something to look at.  I'll give it a look.

[Bastion.Systems]

I'm currently working on some new content for the next release, so the fix will have to wait til then.

Hype get

[AxleMC131]

Is it intended that every Morningstar comes with a converted hangar modification?

Yeah, the hullmod is built-in.

Ummm... Forgive me if I'm being thicker than set concrete, but why could you not just give it a fighter bay in the "shipdata.csv"?

[Midnight Kitsune]

Is it intended that every Morningstar comes with a converted hangar modification?

Yeah, the hullmod is built-in.

Ummm... Forgive me if I'm being thicker than set concrete, but why could you not just give it a fighter bay in the "shipdata.csv"?

Because converted hangers are not as powerful as real ones

[Bastion.Systems]

Is it intended that every Morningstar comes with a converted hangar modification?

Yeah, the hullmod is built-in.

Ummm... Forgive me if I'm being thicker than set concrete, but why could you not just give it a fighter bay in the "shipdata.csv"?

You can't install hangar upgrading hull mods on converted hangars and I believe they got slower fighter replace rate.

[Sy]

You can't install hangar upgrading hull mods on converted hangars and I believe they got slower fighter replace rate.

yep, 75% slower on destroyers. and perhaps the most important drawback is that they don't allow quick refitting of returning fighters at all, which is a big deal for any kind of bomber.

basically, built-in Converted Hangar is a way to give a ship a bit of carrier capability when a normal flight deck would be way too powerful.

[AxleMC131]

You can't install hangar upgrading hull mods on converted hangars and I believe they got slower fighter replace rate.

Because converted hangers are not as powerful as real ones

yep, 75% slower on destroyers. and perhaps the most important drawback is that they don't allow quick refitting of returning fighters at all, which is a big deal for any kind of bomber.

basically, built-in Converted Hangar is a way to give a ship a bit of carrier capability when a normal flight deck would be way too powerful.

Ah, okay, so it's deliberately a sub-standard flight deck to assert that the ship isn't a carrier, but still wants some fighter capabilities. I can understand that.