Or it still take effect fleetwide, but would cut down the fuel use for each ship rather than calculate on the total fuel the fleet use, and showing its effect on every ship in the ship tooltip?
Exactly, yeah.
Do you mean in the past this calculation is wrong?
It was wrong just for display purposes, it was still deducting the correct (reduced) amount of fuel.
Am I'm missing, or there is no mention of situation, when colonized gas giant got name change, but retains original name on global (hyperspace) map?
It's on my list! Hopefully will be able to get to it.
Out of curiosity, if the player somehow destroys (or in Nex, takes over the sector) every non-player planet in the sector, does it imply planetary trade income will drop to zero by the end? Is the population and infrastructure of large planets sufficient to pay the entire upkeep of said planet (i.e. are they potentially self-sufficient if they have all industries and make all goods?), or is the goal of being the only sector power as an end game goal non-viable due to insufficient credit generation near the end?
Right, the income from exports would drop to 0. Whether the income from P&I is enough depends on a lot of things - what the player has as far as upkeep reductions and income increases, how many industries and structures they have, the hazard rating of the colonies, etc.
I'm pretty sure a self-sufficient set of colonies at that point is possible, since you could get quite efficient with it if that was your specific goal. I'd also imagine a general-purpose set of colonies that relied on export income would have to be pared down quite a bit in terms of what industries and structures they have.
Wow, it;s always good to see an active developer fixing what appears to be lots of minor issues but has big gameplay effects.
Thank you!
I would guess that as the market total is 0, then your income from exports is effectively 0 as well. The economy in starsector is all kinds of strange and nonsensical anyways.
"You've literally killed off all your trade partners and therefore get no more money from trade" seems pretty sensible to me