Fractal Softworks Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4

Author Topic: [0.9.1a] Oga Portrait Pack  (Read 58756 times)

namad

  • Lieutenant
  • **
  • Posts: 86
    • View Profile
Re: [0.9.1a] Oga Portrait Pack
« Reply #30 on: July 21, 2019, 06:24:19 PM »

Lawyer's don't just sit around trying to make trouble. Paramount basically has a policy of never going after non-profit fanworks that don't literally use their art (as in literally using their footage and pictures). Paramount already hired lawyers. Some random 25 year old can't just sue alex without Paramount's permission.

But yeah, 100%, BOTs go after this stuff really hard. On youtube that is, not on twitch, or really anywhere but youtube. Not really because of lawyer's but just because of youtube's automated systems.
If you're a youtuber with 21 subscribers you will probably use this sort of mod, if you have millions of followers you just won't? All this said maybe some other IP is being copied here? That's the only one I've noticed just using my own brain though. Maybe there are others for things I don't know of.

For example including a mario portrait? Probably a bad idea, nintendo sometimes goes HARD at fanart. Paramount though is the opposite.
Logged

MesoTroniK

  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 1731
  • I am going to destroy your ships
    • View Profile
Re: [0.9.1a] Oga Portrait Pack
« Reply #31 on: July 21, 2019, 06:24:55 PM »

You are a dirtbag Ogaburan, your entire argument is "others steal so I can too", and "because it has to be done manually by the end user I can mess with other mods by providing pre-made files without talking to the author".

Did you even look at the licenses for any of the mods you are doing this to? Hint, I know you didn't because some allow this and some do not. And to those of you defending him? Disgusting, if he wants to steal? Fine, he can wallow in his own trash and put himself at risk and while I won't like it but when he does this to other mods? It crosses a line that should not be.

Ask *first*, is that really so much to ask for you to show even a modicum of respect to other mod authors? But no, why would you do that when you don't do that for all the stolen art either. The internet is not a bucket of free goodies to use however you damn well please. There is a real person behind every screen, contrary to what you believe.

namad

  • Lieutenant
  • **
  • Posts: 86
    • View Profile
Re: [0.9.1a] Oga Portrait Pack
« Reply #32 on: July 21, 2019, 06:29:20 PM »

In terms of copyright law.... others steal so I can steal... is a valid defense. (Literally so in case of trademark cases, more metaphorically so in case of copyright).
Although yeah, if he's using another modders work? I can see why those modders would be upset. I'm lazy though and so I haven't dug around in any files, I've just used the 0.9 version stock. I'd be all for removing whatever optional files included, if only because hardly anyone is going even bother looking at those files, other than modders (who will be upset about it.)

If the non-modders who won't mind.... never look. Then at the same time the modders with the the interest to look are unhappy. It's pretty much a win-win to remove those files.
Logged

Plushie God

  • Ensign
  • *
  • Posts: 6
    • View Profile
Re: [0.9.1a] Oga Portrait Pack
« Reply #33 on: July 21, 2019, 09:37:44 PM »

Aside from the fact that this is stolen art, the least you could do was ask permission. Modders should be acknowledged beforehand before you involve them in any of your works

Earlier in the thread Soren said he would rather not be affected by the mod. What if you actually made DME portraits? What then? Probably be taking down the mod temporarily. This is also not including the fact that the other modders involved have not caught wind of this mod yet.

Apart from the breaking of copyright laws, the least you could do was show basic manners and courtesy. Even if it’s as “small” as a portrait mod.
Logged
I make terrible SS meme videos on YouTube, support trash like me today

Harmful Mechanic

  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 1340
  • On break.
    • View Profile
Re: [0.9.1a] Oga Portrait Pack
« Reply #34 on: July 21, 2019, 10:14:20 PM »

Artwork is automatically under copyright, and altering that artwork (I don't know who came up with the various percentage-alteration statements floating around the internet, but they're all nonsense) doesn't change that. At best, you might be let off the hook because there are no actionable damages, or there's nothing at stake worth a lawyer's time, but none of that has any bearing on the legality of what you're doing.

Trademark stuff is more complicated; but none of this really applies; registering a trademark for a free video game mod is double chocolate crazytown. If you need a trademark in the first place, you can afford to have a lawyer explain your rights and how to defend them.

(As far as morality, which is closer to where Meso is arguing from, I don't think copyright is a moral guideline, either; the moral guideline I would use is more like 'please 1) ask permission and 2) be adding value' and as far as I'm concerned we're 0 for 2 here.)

My only issue is that I don't want to be involved in this whole benighted mess, and he was nice enough to remove that from the thread if not from Dropbox, so I'm mostly happy.

What if you actually made DME portraits? What then?

I probably would have made the same request. I don't care if people tweak the mod, I just don't want to answer support comments if people are messing around in the files and caused the problem they want me to fix. 'Don't make work for other people unnecessarily' is just polite.
« Last Edit: July 21, 2019, 11:43:40 PM by Soren »
Logged

Ogaburan

  • Ensign
  • *
  • Posts: 19
    • View Profile
Re: [0.9.1a] Oga Portrait Pack
« Reply #35 on: July 21, 2019, 10:53:57 PM »

Earlier in the thread Soren said he would rather not be affected by the mod. What if you actually made DME portraits? What then? Probably be taking down the mod temporarily. This is also not including the fact that the other modders involved have not caught wind of this mod yet.
I did, and already removed those optional recommendations. No issues what-so-ever.

Im reluctant to address it, but it seems i should.
There is a reason why mods not including totally original art, dont ask for permission first. It has nothing to do with rudeness, but i'll let the less naiive figure out why.
(this is standard practice, sometimes people even post on alts for the same reason)

Considering Meso's popularity and his "little" tantrum, i doubt this is not the most infamous mod starsector ever had.
In fact, only one guy coming to white-knight him is surprising to me.
As given the choice of getting good-boy points with a popular modder, or taking part is an extremely derivative aesthetic mod, is a no brainer to me.

Although yeah, if he's using another modders work? I can see why those modders would be upset. I'm lazy though and so I haven't dug around in any files, I've just used the 0.9 version stock.
You are welcome to dig, and find out i in fact do not. Unless you count adding blue circles to SCY, but thats something general my mod does.
Technically it is (but is it?), its also optional and not included in the main mod anyway. Its just so if anyone wants to combine the mods, they can make it all fit in the stupid circle.
Its part of making mods compatible with each-other (which is standard practice).

What this is really about, is that i suggested people might want to change the portraits Meso made for a mod.
(Something i did unknowingly btw, as its hard for an outsider to keep track of who is credited where, as a bunch of people are just credited everywhere without stating what they actually did)
Similar to the original artwork of the game itself, i find it to be good work (but who am i to judge), but not my cup of aesthetic tea or how i want to experience starsector.

Problem is, Meso seems to have carved himself somewhat of a position as the official unofficial portrait maker.
My mod is messing with his usefulness to the community AND more importantly his E-Begging bottom line.

If the non-modders who won't mind.... never look. Then at the same time the modders with the the interest to look are unhappy. It's pretty much a win-win to remove those files.
That was my initial statement, as soon as i understood this is not common practice in this modding community.
(Again, providing optional files, is very common in other communities)

After a few conversations with people, i found out not all people like this clique of the "Vice squad" Meso seems to be the head of (as a moderator in an unofficial discord).
A clique sitting on the sidelines yelling "OP!, Derivative!, Not 100% Original Art!" while E-Begging and driving away "sub par", or things that just dont mash with "their" version of starsector.
Needless to say, this is cancerous behavior.
Yelling "Haram" or "DMCA" wont stop people wanting, or preferring not so original artwork in their mods.
(Especially since legality has nothing to do with it, unless you stream and then a bot might take you down. Not all people who play starsector stream. Its literally scare tactics.)

It already has driven off would be modders.
Lets face it, the standards of modding are set EXTREMELY high for this game. Some very talented people who have enough free time contributed and are contributing.
It is already very intimidating for most. The forum is a graveyard of half finished efforts by people discouraged by this reason alone.
But even "derivative" work like "Dassault-Mikoyan Engineering - Only RED!" Has a place. (Just a silly example, Soren might even approve)
Even a simple act as giving a ship a paint-job is potentially hard work, especially for someone who is new to modding/programming/drawing/java/photoshop/gimp or lack of free time, or even a language barrier.
Baby's first mod, is usually a barely functional ugly mess. Yet still, people who make stuff, usually end up improving, and might one day contribute something even the "Vice Squad" would consider "worthy". People do tend to hover towards original work eventually, as a sense of pride if nothing else.

Having to stay hidden and unpublished due to lack of acceptance by that clique seems to have harbored resentment.
So i was actually asked by people to make something of a stand against this. Force people to make a public stand, so to say.
Im enough of an outsider not to care where the wind blows, and this mod is very stupid, so imagine how people react to something more substantial.

Another example,
From what i understand there isn't an official set in stone lore (Since the main writer leftorsomesuch) there is a general guideline.
Yet things are labeled not "lore friendly" left and right, by lore specialists.

But most important,
What if someone would want to make a Warhammer mod? An EVE mod? Haven forbid a StarTreck mod!
As it stands even talks about doing something like that is immediately shot down (and these are huge projects in need of collaborations if they are to be done justice).
Not sure this is the right approach, this is literally what mods are for.
« Last Edit: July 21, 2019, 11:00:16 PM by Ogaburan »
Logged

Harmful Mechanic

  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 1340
  • On break.
    • View Profile
Re: [0.9.1a] Oga Portrait Pack
« Reply #36 on: July 21, 2019, 11:41:49 PM »

I actually have a no-derivatives CC license (not that people read licenses), although really it's an I-dare-you case; I'm sure someone who really wanted to keep posting their low-effort junk could outlast my nearly-nonexistent willingness to give chase. I might decide, okay, this modding community has now become toxic, I'll just stop posting anything and maintain my own copy. The point of modding is fun, after all, and dealing with entitled gamer nerds who think they're customers or managers is the opposite of fun.

I don't care if someone makes a Warhammer or EVE or Star Trek mod, but I don't think it would be any good; if the people who want one could make anything at all, they would have made something by now (feel free to make one and prove me wrong, though).
« Last Edit: July 21, 2019, 11:55:21 PM by Soren »
Logged

MesoTroniK

  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 1731
  • I am going to destroy your ships
    • View Profile
Re: [0.9.1a] Oga Portrait Pack
« Reply #37 on: July 22, 2019, 12:00:25 AM »

Oh my God, this is just LOL. You seem to think I took your mod as a personal attack? LOL, you sir are a hilarious dirtbag. I have brought up the same problems with other portrait mods that didn't even replace art. This has nothing to do with me, this has to do with you. Stop projecting and looking for something that doesn't exist and try looking in a mirror instead you stupid thieving troll.

I also have done very few portraits for anyone else (others have done far more in this community), if you are gonna do a call out maybe try doing a good job of it. But nah, you are bad at being bad which is pretty tiring. I can at least appreciate dirtbags who are good at doing what they do.

You call what I said earlier a tantrum? Nah, you might call this a bit of one though because congratulations you actually managed to *** me off this time because you are just telling lies and seeing things that don't even exist.

And E-begging... What? What E-begging? Again making up lies about me you dirtbag. Wow I got a donation button in my thread, such begging wow. And you are messing with my usefulness LOL. Everyone point and laugh at this man, for he shouts into the sky at that which he doesn't understand and seems to think his stolen asset mod somehow hurts my contributions or something? Most of contributions to other mods are work trades by the way, that and random advice :)

And again misrepresenting things, wow I offer balance advice so that drives folks off? That sounds like *their* problem. And driving off "sub par mods". Heh, yea I would love to have an example of that because it never happened. I have spent an inordinate amount of time helping other modders, as work trades and often even for nothing at all.

You are but shouting into the wind, accusing people of things that never happened and you sir are a piece of crap. Who still is modifying other mods heh.

Ogaburan

  • Ensign
  • *
  • Posts: 19
    • View Profile
Re: [0.9.1a] Oga Portrait Pack
« Reply #38 on: July 22, 2019, 12:56:02 AM »

Oh my God, this is just LOL. You seem to think I took your mod as a personal attack? LOL, you sir are a hilarious dirtbag.
You are literally calling me names... both here and on PM's. English is not my native language, but i think i can spot an insult if its thrown in my face repeatedly.
You are literally asking for donations for admittedly minimal work.
Same insulting way you interpret what i did as theft, i can interpret what you do as e-begging. Both, technically right, but not nice.
I also have done very few portraits for anyone else (others have done far more in this community), if you are gonna do a call out maybe try doing a good job of it.
No one other than you, and the people you activelly rallied behind you, had problmes with this mod.
A mod that is featured in the main mod list for QUITE some time (December 2018).
A mod only revised due to popular demand.
You are  also  literally asking for people to publicly withdraw support (even those that gave it to me back in 2018, which i actually forgot i had lol [for SCY and DA, who are still relevant], as i dont use the forum's pm boxes much).

and this ISN'T your first time doing this, by your own words, every portrait pack needs to have your personal seal of approval.
High horse much.
And exactly proving my point, to anyone willing to give me the benefit of the doubt, despite your status.

Nothing i said is untrue.
You are just more popular and well established in this community. Not right.

I don't care if someone makes a Warhammer or EVE or Star Trek mod, but I don't think it would be any good; if the people who want one could make anything at all, they would have made something by now (feel free to make one and prove me wrong, though).
I actually agree with you, i also dont think these examples would be any FUN for me. And i probably wont use, in my game.

As to... "any good"? Just because we dont like ,literally the first three examples of franchises i came up with, does not mean no one else would find it fun.
These are at the end of the day popular franchises for whatever reason.
Just because a fan of these franchises with enough free time and know-how haven't discovered this modding community does not mean it wouldn't have potentially been a very popular total conversion.

But this kind of attitude is exactly why, someone will be totally discouraged from even attempting. Which is my point.
This is the first modding community where i experienced such negativity towards franchises with pre-existing artwork.
To the point that pictures of Captain Picard merit the written permission from Viacom themselves, so the community wont frown on its usage.
Logged

MesoTroniK

  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 1731
  • I am going to destroy your ships
    • View Profile
Re: [0.9.1a] Oga Portrait Pack
« Reply #39 on: July 22, 2019, 01:05:02 AM »

Well, Ogaburan if you are gonna take shots at me? Tell the truth, I certainly have flaws that can be poked but instead you are sitting here telling lies. You came here, and updated your mod doing something modestly illegal, got called out for it, and are now throwing a fit while spewing lie after lie after lie about me.

Asking for donations, a passive button sitting in my mod thread at the very bottom... That is asking apparently? Kind of sort of but that is a stretch at the least! And if spending thousands of hours of work on my own mods and others is "minimal" then I would like to what you consider significant! And there is nothing to interpret here about theft, you yourself admitted it let alone a legal definition of it LOL.

Notice that I didn't post in this mod thread until you started modifying other mods? Protip, that was the same for other portrait mods too. I never said a word until they messed with other mods. That isn't asking for a seal of approval, it is asking for folks like you to respect others, their work, *and their mod licenses*. Once again stop projecting, this is on you not me.

You are doing nothing but making yourself look bad, this mod, what it does, what you are saying, and the lies you are spewing is transparent as a plate of glass while I stand here steadfast in the face of your fabrications. The burden of proof falls on you, pretty much every single thing you have said IS in fact untrue.

EDIT: Fixed Typos
« Last Edit: July 22, 2019, 01:07:30 AM by MesoTroniK »
Logged

MesoTroniK

  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 1731
  • I am going to destroy your ships
    • View Profile
Re: [0.9.1a] Oga Portrait Pack
« Reply #40 on: July 22, 2019, 01:22:20 AM »

This is worth a new post, not another edit.

You are literally calling me names... both here and on PM's. English is not my native language, but i think i can spot an insult if its thrown in my face repeatedly.

Do you *really* want to go there? Because I will post this PM that you started if that is what it takes, and it will vindicate me because I called you no names in that PM. The truth is self evident, to everyone but you.

Gothars

  • Global Moderator
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 4403
  • Eschewing obfuscatory verbosity.
    • View Profile
Re: [0.9.1a] Oga Portrait Pack
« Reply #41 on: July 22, 2019, 02:28:35 AM »

I'll lock this topic until we had time to investigate the various complaints about it.
Logged
The game was completed 8 years ago and we get a free expansion every year.

Arranging holidays in an embrace with the Starsector is priceless.

Alex

  • Administrator
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 24125
    • View Profile
Re: [0.9.1a] Oga Portrait Pack
« Reply #42 on: July 23, 2019, 09:55:50 AM »

Unlocking the topic.

@Ogaburan:
Please take down the download link in the OP. Copyright-infringing mods are not allowed on the forum; this broadly falls under the "no piracy or other illegal activities" section of the rules.

It's also not right; I know I'd be unhappy if someone used portraits from Starsector for a mod in another game without asking first. (For the record, people *have* asked about this sort of thing and I've said yes before; it's not something I generally mind. Asking just shows a basic level of respect.) If you're able to obtain permission for whatever subset of the portraits, please feel free to re-post.


@MesoTroniK:
You've got a PM.
Logged

Ogaburan

  • Ensign
  • *
  • Posts: 19
    • View Profile
Re: [0.9.1a] Oga Portrait Pack
« Reply #43 on: July 23, 2019, 10:43:56 AM »

Ive removed the link.

But, unless u guys want to keep it as some sort of guidline as to what is allowed, this thread can be deleted.
Logged

Alex

  • Administrator
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 24125
    • View Profile
Re: [0.9.1a] Oga Portrait Pack
« Reply #44 on: July 23, 2019, 10:52:08 AM »

Thank you.

I'd prefer to keep the thread around, just for forum history purposes - generally threads that are no longer active are still around, right? But if you would strongly prefer for the thread to be removed instead, let me know and I'll do that.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4