1
Mods / Re: [0.97a] Star Lords- Mount & Blade Campaign in Space v0.1.0
« on: August 26, 2024, 10:22:08 AM »
Yeah okay sure
But where is the butter?
But where is the butter?
Fractal Softworks Forum
- September 16, 2024, 09:50:32 PM
- Welcome, Guest
News:
Starsector 0.97a is out! (02/02/24); New blog post: Planet Search Overhaul (07/13/24)
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
Mods / Re: [0.97 / 0.96] Indies Expansion Pack v2.0 (Content and HUBSHIP update)
« on: August 02, 2024, 03:25:25 PM »
Okay, double checked.
The reductions to DP, supply usage, and repair costs only apply if there isn't already a similar existing effect from another source like a different hullmod or skill. This is probably mod conflict on my end.
The burn boost and ability to store two frigates doesn't work at all.
But hot dang, even without it, this thing is an absolute unit.
Edit: So uh... The Djoeng is invincible. As in infinite hull points. The two side hulls can be destroyed, but the main ship has the Vast Bulk hullmod; so it can only die if all attached parts are destroyed. Problem is the shield module can't be reached with most weapons since it's INSIDE the main part of the ship.
The right barge module has 6 additional fighter bays, but the left module has none.
The reductions to DP, supply usage, and repair costs only apply if there isn't already a similar existing effect from another source like a different hullmod or skill. This is probably mod conflict on my end.
The burn boost and ability to store two frigates doesn't work at all.
But hot dang, even without it, this thing is an absolute unit.
Edit: So uh... The Djoeng is invincible. As in infinite hull points. The two side hulls can be destroyed, but the main ship has the Vast Bulk hullmod; so it can only die if all attached parts are destroyed. Problem is the shield module can't be reached with most weapons since it's INSIDE the main part of the ship.
The right barge module has 6 additional fighter bays, but the left module has none.
3
Mods / Re: [0.97 / 0.96] Indies Expansion Pack v2.0 (Content and HUBSHIP update)
« on: August 01, 2024, 10:44:42 PM »
The fleet gantry on the Djoeng doesn't seem to work, which is a shame since I managed to salvage it in the fringe worlds.
4
Mods / Re: [0.97a] Secrets of the Frontier (0.14.2) - indev campaign mod
« on: July 27, 2024, 01:32:55 AM »
So are there any other obtainable ships with the 1337 hax ability? I'm using the Power in Numbers start and that leaves a certain capship basically unusable.
The only ships for sale appears to be upgraded derelicts.
The only ships for sale appears to be upgraded derelicts.
5
Mods / Re: [0.97 / 0.96] Indies Expansion Pack v2.0 (Content and HUBSHIP update)
« on: July 26, 2024, 05:56:44 PM »
YEAH LET'S GO LEGIONSLAUGHT
First thing to update once I get back.
First thing to update once I get back.
6
Mods / Re: [0.97 / 0.96] Indies Expansion Pack v1.93 (Updated)
« on: July 10, 2024, 03:09:10 AM »Currently im planning to add feature to it so your stored frigates can land and re-arms on designated converted frigates hangar ship, though i havent decide to whether put it on already existing hullmod, or make another one that doesnt need "stored frigates" hullmod to let frigates land on frigates hangar ship
Arma Armatura allows their "frigates" to land on any ship with a fighter bay; which is pretty powerful. And there's that other mod which allows you to turn any frigate into a fighter LPC.
Personally, I feel that "frigate fighters" might be a bit much for the scope of this mod; but by all means you do you.
Also, exploit. Once you add the stored frigate hullmod, you no longer need the converted hangar hullmod. You can remove the hullmod, store the "carrier", store the frigate and add the stored frigate hullmod to another ship, etc.
7
Mods / Re: [0.96a] Console Commands v2023.05.05
« on: July 09, 2024, 11:52:22 PM »How do i add inbuilt weapons to be able to be dropped as rare_bpThat's not a function of the console, but defined by whatever mod the weapon comes from. Anything weapon tagged as "SYSTEM" can never appear as an individual item.
I have tried with the Firecane Artillery from SEEKER.
Tried adding it via console commands, but it never gives me the item. Always something else
If you edit the mod to remove the tag, it can appear as a regular item and even as an individual BP.
8
Mods / Re: [0.97 / 0.96] Indies Expansion Pack v1.93 (Updated)
« on: July 09, 2024, 01:14:19 PM »
Trying out the stored frigate hullmod, shouldn't it also reduce the stored ships sensor signature?
It's a niche, but neat concept. The number of ships that can mount it across the entire modding scene is still probably single digits; but it's a neat way of giving more utility to support vessels.
It's a niche, but neat concept. The number of ships that can mount it across the entire modding scene is still probably single digits; but it's a neat way of giving more utility to support vessels.
9
Mods / Re: [0.97a] Random Assortment of Things
« on: June 30, 2024, 11:49:53 AM »
Right, Sierra comes from SotF, and I was apparently using an older version where she appeared on the captain menu.
So that's my bad.
So that's my bad.
10
Mods / Re: [0.97a] Random Assortment of Things
« on: June 27, 2024, 03:24:12 PM »
As a hipster that didn't take Automated Ships, is there anything else I can do with the Neuro core?
Also, what would happen if I integrate Purple Orblady into her ship? Could I still transfer her out? Would test it myself but am away from my rig for a bit and it's gonna bother me until I test it.
Also, what would happen if I integrate Purple Orblady into her ship? Could I still transfer her out? Would test it myself but am away from my rig for a bit and it's gonna bother me until I test it.
11
Bug Reports & Support (modded) / Re: Limit my visible fleet on the overmap, too many ships causing massive slowdown
« on: June 26, 2024, 12:35:09 AM »
Yeah, after looking into it a bit, it turns out it's a built-in hullmod from a mod.
Gonna test a bit more before making a report in their thread.
Gonna test a bit more before making a report in their thread.
12
Modding / Re: Misc modding questions that are too minor to warrant their own thread
« on: June 25, 2024, 12:29:14 AM »
Is there a way to limit the number of ships that appear on the overworld map? I mean, the blob of ships that represents my fleet. For some reason, once the number of ships hits 15, doesn't seem to matter what kind, traveling drops to single frames.
Combat works fine, all other menus are normal. I'm using Miko's JRE upgrade and given it 12GB Ram, and there's no change in the GPU usage.
Combat works fine, all other menus are normal. I'm using Miko's JRE upgrade and given it 12GB Ram, and there's no change in the GPU usage.
13
Bug Reports & Support (modded) / Limit my visible fleet on the overmap, too many ships causing massive slowdown
« on: June 24, 2024, 09:38:05 PM »
Once I start getting more than 15 ships, my overworld map starts slowing down dramatically. Is there a setting where I can limit the ships on my fleet icon? Cutting down on my ships fixes the issue right up; but I kinda need those ships.
14
Mods / Re: [0.97a] Random Assortment of Things
« on: June 24, 2024, 01:28:16 AM »
So here's a weird crash:
So the [REDACTED] Snek can hold a converted hangar in the tail section, and putting a fighter in there and sending it into battle causes this crash.
Not sure where exactly the bug is here, maybe we aren't supposed to be able to salvage the [REDACTED] Snek, maybe we aren't supposed to put converted hangar on it, being a phase ship,; maybe it's because it had a human pilot with the [SUPER ULTRA REDACTED] core?
Spoiler
292419 [Thread-2] ERROR com.fs.starfarer.combat.CombatMain - java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke "com.fs.starfarer.combat.entities.Ship.isHulk()" because "<local2>" is null
java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke "com.fs.starfarer.combat.entities.Ship.isHulk()" because "<local2>" is null
at com.fs.starfarer.combat.ai.FighterAI.getCarrierTarget(Unknown Source) ~[port_obf.jar:?]
at com.fs.starfarer.combat.ai.FighterAI.pickManeuver(Unknown Source) ~[port_obf.jar:?]
at com.fs.starfarer.combat.ai.FighterAI.advance(Unknown Source) ~[port_obf.jar:?]
at com.fs.starfarer.combat.CombatEngine.advanceInner(Unknown Source) ~[port_obf.jar:?]
at com.fs.starfarer.combat.CombatEngine.advance(Unknown Source) ~[port_obf.jar:?]
at com.fs.starfarer.combat.CombatState.traverse(Unknown Source) ~[port_obf.jar:?]
at com.fs.state.AppDriver.begin(Unknown Source) ~[port.common_obf.jar:?]
at com.fs.starfarer.combat.CombatMain.main(Unknown Source) ~[port_obf.jar:?]
at com.fs.starfarer.StarfarerLauncher.super(Unknown Source) ~[port_obf.jar:?]
at com.fs.starfarer.StarfarerLauncher$1.run(Unknown Source) ~[port_obf.jar:?]
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1575) [?:?]
java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke "com.fs.starfarer.combat.entities.Ship.isHulk()" because "<local2>" is null
at com.fs.starfarer.combat.ai.FighterAI.getCarrierTarget(Unknown Source) ~[port_obf.jar:?]
at com.fs.starfarer.combat.ai.FighterAI.pickManeuver(Unknown Source) ~[port_obf.jar:?]
at com.fs.starfarer.combat.ai.FighterAI.advance(Unknown Source) ~[port_obf.jar:?]
at com.fs.starfarer.combat.CombatEngine.advanceInner(Unknown Source) ~[port_obf.jar:?]
at com.fs.starfarer.combat.CombatEngine.advance(Unknown Source) ~[port_obf.jar:?]
at com.fs.starfarer.combat.CombatState.traverse(Unknown Source) ~[port_obf.jar:?]
at com.fs.state.AppDriver.begin(Unknown Source) ~[port.common_obf.jar:?]
at com.fs.starfarer.combat.CombatMain.main(Unknown Source) ~[port_obf.jar:?]
at com.fs.starfarer.StarfarerLauncher.super(Unknown Source) ~[port_obf.jar:?]
at com.fs.starfarer.StarfarerLauncher$1.run(Unknown Source) ~[port_obf.jar:?]
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1575) [?:?]
[close]
So the [REDACTED] Snek can hold a converted hangar in the tail section, and putting a fighter in there and sending it into battle causes this crash.
Not sure where exactly the bug is here, maybe we aren't supposed to be able to salvage the [REDACTED] Snek, maybe we aren't supposed to put converted hangar on it, being a phase ship,; maybe it's because it had a human pilot with the [SUPER ULTRA REDACTED] core?
15
Mods / Re: [0.97a] Metelson Industries 2.0.3 The Sound Update
« on: June 19, 2024, 04:09:24 PM »
Personally, I find it hard to kit the Gadfar as anything other than a dakkaboat because of that oh so tasty ammo feeder and overlapping mount arcs.
Similarly, I load the new ship up with Padecs and heavy masers and watch the lightshow. Whether a certain navy would appreciate their peace offering used as a glorified rock breaker? Well...
The Acutor certainly has gotten a new lease on life; but there's still kind of an issue.
With an assortment of easily filled slots and before learning all the fancy hull mods you can just load it up with capacitors/vents and use it as an early game beatstick. It's inevitable that it'll be replaced with something else; whether a more combat capable ship or a support ship with a better logistical profile (like the Stareater that also sports both a salvage and repair gantry at half the maintenance cost). That's just an inevitable part of being an "early game" capital.
However, as a capital, you'll need both a Metelson commission and a Cooperative level relations. With relations being much harder to grind than money, you'll probably get access to better ships long before you can access the acutor; short of finding a severely D-modded version on the black market.
To remedy this, I'd like to suggest the acutor be available on civilian markets (much like the Stareater).
Speaking of markets, I don't know why but the frigates for sale at Metelson ports are almost entirely dominated by Farins. Destroyers are cruisers on offer are varied enough, but outside the rare Vigil and occasional Pala, it's 80-90% Farins..
Similarly, I load the new ship up with Padecs and heavy masers and watch the lightshow. Whether a certain navy would appreciate their peace offering used as a glorified rock breaker? Well...
The Acutor certainly has gotten a new lease on life; but there's still kind of an issue.
With an assortment of easily filled slots and before learning all the fancy hull mods you can just load it up with capacitors/vents and use it as an early game beatstick. It's inevitable that it'll be replaced with something else; whether a more combat capable ship or a support ship with a better logistical profile (like the Stareater that also sports both a salvage and repair gantry at half the maintenance cost). That's just an inevitable part of being an "early game" capital.
However, as a capital, you'll need both a Metelson commission and a Cooperative level relations. With relations being much harder to grind than money, you'll probably get access to better ships long before you can access the acutor; short of finding a severely D-modded version on the black market.
To remedy this, I'd like to suggest the acutor be available on civilian markets (much like the Stareater).
Speaking of markets, I don't know why but the frigates for sale at Metelson ports are almost entirely dominated by Farins. Destroyers are cruisers on offer are varied enough, but outside the rare Vigil and occasional Pala, it's 80-90% Farins..