Starsector 0.97a is out! (02/02/24); New blog post: Save/Load UI, Autosave, Intel Map Markers, and More (04/10/24)
Heck yeah! Anime girls, Pink ships, fireworks, And single digit frame rates. Cant wait mansWith any luck, single-digit frames shouldn't be too much of an issue moving forward! The missile AI is slightly more optimized and and each weapon's burst potential is still reduced in comparison to pre-2.0. But most significantly, the changes to ship layout will definitely put a cap on how many missiles you can have on screen at the same time. In short, you can look forward to 12 fps rather than 8!
1: the yellow smiley on the Sapphrites armour plate looks a little out of place to me.I dunno, I like it. But I could add an alt-skin in the folder without it that players can swap in if they like!
2: With YRXP not having any shields (and likely no phase ships either) it brings a (slight) issue with the 0.95 skill tree, that being how you have to pick the shield/phase skill to get to the missile skill (which is blatantly going to be a high value skill on YRXP ships). Have you thought about any way to make combat 4 (shield/phase) not a wasted skill point if piloting YRXP ships?Nope! I can't be helped! I've seen how crazy the missile specialization bonus is for YRXP though... I wonder if it'll be nerfed in the near future? Otherwise, I'll have to balance around it....
Thank you, fixed!Fast! Thank you very much. Looking forward to the next patch.
for(WeaponAPI weapon : ship.getAllWeapons()) {
if(weapon.getType().compareTo(WeaponType.MISSILE) != 0) {
continue;
}
reloadData = BASE_VALUES.get(weapon.getId());
log.info("found missile " + weapon.getId());
if(reloadData != null) {
log.info("found *correct*! missile " + weapon.getId() + " | " + reloadData.ammopersec + " | " + reloadData.reloadSize);
weapon.getAmmoTracker().setAmmoPerSecond(reloadData.ammopersec);
weapon.getAmmoTracker().setReloadSize(reloadData.reloadSize);
log.info("check " + weapon.getId() + " | " + weapon.getAmmoTracker().getAmmoPerSecond() + " | " + weapon.getAmmoTracker().getReloadSize());
}
}
38215 [Thread-3] INFO data.scripts.hullmods.yrxp_engineering - found missile yrxp_aam_3
38215 [Thread-3] INFO data.scripts.hullmods.yrxp_engineering - found missile yrxp_aam_3
38215 [Thread-3] INFO data.scripts.hullmods.yrxp_engineering - found missile yrxp_sead_58
38215 [Thread-3] INFO data.scripts.hullmods.yrxp_engineering - found missile yrxp_PART_missile_frigate_b_srm_33
38215 [Thread-3] INFO data.scripts.hullmods.yrxp_engineering - found *correct*! missile yrxp_PART_missile_frigate_b_srm_33 | 1.3333334 | 32.0
38216 [Thread-3] INFO data.scripts.hullmods.yrxp_engineering - check yrxp_PART_missile_frigate_b_srm_33 | 0.0 | 32.0
Any idea as to when this mod will be made compatible with 0.95?Hi, as I have announced in the YRXP thread, I'm currently not working on my mods at the moment, but will do this one right after YRXP when I do come back. That said, I have worked on it a bit before stopping and for instance, I've already done this suggestion below.
Could you please add a setting option to remove that asteroid miner ship? I personally don't like it and don't want to use it or see it among pirate ships.The Lithovore will only be available for purchase in the special markets made available by this mod (same place you get the forge ship hullmods) and no other faction.
The unique aesthetic and playstyle of this faction really speaks to me. I know you've mentioned previously that YRXP is sort of on the backburner and that's completely understandable with all the effort you've put into it and your other mods. I never knew about the hullmod slowdown, I guess my games haven't gone on long enough for it to affect it to a noticeable degree. I'm still running the old starsector version with YRXP 2.1.2 while I wait for issues with the new starsector update to be smoothed out.Thank you very much! I'm glad you enjoyed it! But I'd also like to say that YRXP is not on the backburner anymore! In fact, it'll be the first of my mods that will be compatible with the new version!
Just wanted to chime in that I am also looking forward to the fixed/updated version. Thanks for all your hard work.
Help! I'm a few years into my current campaign with YRXP (and bunch of other mods), specifically in cycle 212 now. Caparice and the yuri faction are still intact, and everything seemed fine until a few months of in-game time ago, when I would get a lot of micro-stutters every couple in-game days. I'm talking a 1/2 second stutter every second on the campaign layer (but not in combat!), which gets annoying fast. Alt-tabbed out of the game and opened up the logfile, and the whole thing is swamped with YRXP notifications like the following:Hi! Sorry, this error is caused by the Yuri Void Warfare Doctrine hullmod all yuri ships have. I've fixed it on my side, but I can't actually release the fix for you anyway because the mod is already incompatible with older saves even in its WIP state... If you wish to be rid of this problem, I'm afraid you will have to remove all YRXP ships in your fleet. I'm not sure if it also causes a slowdown on the overworld, but if it does, it'll come from YRXP fleets... my apologies for the inconvenience.
I was playing the new RYAZ update and fought Knight Templar ships. It would seem their unique shield type does not react well with the new boarding mechanic as I get a Fatal: null error occasionally when using the skill. Sadly, I'm not sure how to consistently replicate the CTD.Hmm, I've never played with Knight Templar, so I'm afraid I'm unable to give any suggestions. But from a cursory look, it seems the mod is only updated to 0.8.1a, maybe that has something to do with it?
wait, does crew capacity play no role in boarding at all? that's like the most obvious thing to affect it. because after all the fancy, it all boils down to how much meat you can throw in the grinder. because even some unarmed crew that some onslaught might be filled with will easily dispatch those measly five marines that you can send off of a hound, simply due to overwhelming numbers.Uhh, sort of. It's ship size that plays a role in boarding. To give leeway to the edge cases of 0 crew capacity ships (like those of Aria).
Any idea when the YRXP revamp will happen? I'm trying to decide whether to start a game with the new and improved Azalea 2.0.0 now or wait so I can enjoy it and Yuri at the same time.Ah, it won't be anytime soon! I've just started, actually.
This looks amazing!Thank you very much!
Is it possible for the amount of crew vs the number of marines to increase the chance of a negative effect? I want to try this with all of the factions so badly!While it's a fun and immersive idea, I believe there is no cargo for the AI. The feature itself is already slanted in favor of the player but adding this on top...
IW-701-S Seraph Wings (and seemingly all "HELMUT" inspired designs) seem to be a bit odd, from a graphical standpoint, especially with their weapon mounts being ... stretched out, but apart from that, I'm a big fan as you know.Yeah, the _____ Wing-class ships are part of those I'm doing a rethink for. I don't have anything concrete in mind, but I do want to change something about them for the next update.
Do you think the bug that seems to be related to the Aether Shawl or whatever it was is going to be fixed next update, or was that never proven to be true for anyone else but that user?
EDIT: There seems to be one or possibly more variants of ships that have slot id's for weapons assigned to them that don't exist.
Is the CR loss permanent, IE would I have to pay supplies to have it come back after combat is over?Ah, yes, the CR loss is indeed permanent, meaning that it carries over to your campaign after battle! Your concern is quite valid, but in my test campaign I've honestly not even noticed the bump in supply usage when fighting RYAZ. Maybe it has to do with the fact that they're still the only faction with the feature and even then, boarding isn't invoked too often.
Because while using CR as a secondary health bar for combat is neat, if you run into an enemy who boards you could end up paying a LOT of supplies. Depending on how much boarding was done, 2-4 times more supplies than usual could be possible, which is not all that cool.