Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

1

Announcements / Re: Starsector 0.98a (In Development) Patch Notes

« on: February 09, 2025, 07:36:33 AM »

That post tell me one: THATS THE MAN WITHOUT EXCUSE...

I just go buy another copy.

2

Suggestions / Re: Buff the Apex!

« on: January 06, 2025, 12:46:43 AM »

Ooooo, hmm. Wow.
I like it as it is. Maybe its a bit strong, but doesn't feel OP ( or is close to be OP ).

3

Suggestions / Re: Buff the Apex!

« on: January 05, 2025, 03:53:15 PM »

What's with this whining about termination sequence?

4

Suggestions / Re: Switch Odyssey’s Medium Missiles to Synergy

« on: January 03, 2025, 05:55:35 AM »

If you squint. It's Low Tech basically

Most importantly its asymmetric, just like lovely Odyssey.
Would like to see some unveiled story about these two ships.

5

Suggestions / Re: Switch Odyssey’s Medium Missiles to Synergy

« on: January 02, 2025, 05:03:31 PM »

It's sort of like the Apogee is secretly a Low Tech ship

You had to invite apogee to discussion, yes? Personally I think not that explorer hull (clearly modified for combat) would be able to sustain ballistic weaponry.

6

Suggestions / Re: Put cooldown on paragon's fortress shield?

« on: January 01, 2025, 02:13:55 AM »

I think it's great Paragon can flicker. It keeps it dangerous even with its back against the wall and against all odds. It isn't 60 DP for no reason.

Correct, and don't forget that the Paragon sees no benefit from Systems Expertise (one of the stronger skills out there). There's no reason to nerf Fortress Shield, except maybe the Monitor variant...

Mostly agree with all, but about Monitor... Leave little friend alone, he got nerfed :V

7

Suggestions / Re: Switch Odyssey’s Medium Missiles to Synergy

« on: January 01, 2025, 01:51:11 AM »

Hmmm Odyssey... Cheery on cake

I do believe that ship is already special, but... I can be still more special by making Left Large slot side Hybrid and right Large slot Composite :3

8

Suggestions / Re: Don't nerf SO

« on: December 29, 2024, 03:57:00 AM »

So by removing SO, game would open doors to balance ships that relay on it in a way, that they wouldn't have stictly ONE build only (not only ships but weapons too)?

9

Suggestions / Re: where’s my remnant phase carrier

« on: December 26, 2024, 02:25:12 PM »

Perhaps link carrier's phase-state to its fighters phase-state.

Does it want them to deal damage?  Then it has to be phased in!  Does it want them not to get blown up?  Then it has to be phased out, and building flux.

Not sure I'd make it a remnant as such, but it's an interesting idea.

for bombers

10

Suggestions / Re: don't buff Tempest drones too hard please

« on: December 26, 2024, 03:56:51 AM »

"Tempest is one of the strongest frigate" lets make it broken, beside that lets add 3th spawnling :V

11

Suggestions / Re: Marine equipment

« on: December 24, 2024, 04:39:23 AM »

I am for reaper bazooka as their EQ

12

Suggestions / Re: where’s my remnant phase carrier

« on: December 24, 2024, 02:02:12 AM »

lore-wise AI cores and phase doesn't go very well.  This is why Grendel isn't automated. It was originally meant to serve a function similar to a derelict if I understand the text correctly...

But if there is ever a phase ship Remnant, it should be called Eclipse, because most Remnant names are light related

Also, this is why Ziggurat wasn't an AI ship, it was simply haunted

It could be align well with lore despite that. Yo hear me out. That would be reason why AI actually rogued and said phase [redacted] would eliminate all line production of other ship-kind for said reason.

Instead of typical fighter bay, it would send out wings of frigates :V (or something between fighters and frigates - giga-fighters :V) They would be called Umbrella, because initially this was invented to hide from sunshine (a star :V).

13

Suggestions / Re: where’s my remnant phase carrier

« on: December 24, 2024, 01:14:31 AM »

this idea is actually DN xD
Maybe switch Subject to something like: " I don't recall existence of [redacted] phase carrier " :V

14

Suggestions / Re: Anubis name

« on: December 22, 2024, 03:39:50 PM »

My English is probably not good enough, but I'm not sure to understand what's the problem ?

He's on the more extreme end of Christianity. As such anything that can be deemed as idol worships, or the worship of false Gods, even as minor as using something named after a Pagan god, is a sin.

admiral o7

Well, to answer the OP, you can always edit the name of the ships in the csv file ...

right.

I believe topic is exhausted, deemed to be closed, unless Alex would like to add word/s.

15

Suggestions / Re: Anubis name

« on: December 22, 2024, 07:02:14 AM »

Hi Alex, would you reconsider different name for upcoming name of ship - Anubis. I ain't from Egypt pantheon. Thanks.
(Wont be able to say in 1 sentence "I like". Afterwards "Anubis".)

Maybe separate the game and real life. I'm sure whatever higher power you believe in will forgive you for saying you like a fictional ship that someone else named after another deity. Not to mention there's already 3 other ships named after deities (4 if you count hyperion).

I believe in ultimate power, He is jealous.

Thanks, now I can't play hyperion (didn't knew about it's name etymology). Not that liked it anyway - in contrast

Well just to make sure you are safe I'll reveal the other three ships you can avoid. Hermes, prometheus, and atlas.

Hahaha, I will be honest - I have no clue what is that ship "hermes", but know of its existance in game :V

You can adjust the names to whatever you like in the ship_data.csv. It is very easy to do, although direct editing of the source file is not advised. Ideally, you should create a little mod with your own copy of the ship data file. Or, if that's too complicated, at least back up the file before editing it.

well, I can always do mini-mod - thanks.