Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

1

General Discussion / Re: High tech feels like a wet noodle.

« on: April 22, 2024, 07:44:28 AM »

Tritach fleets suck because their doctrine is quantity 1, officers 1, quality 5, which is more or less the worst setup possible. That they also focus on size 5 ships so the entire fleet budget gets eaten up by Dooms, Harbingers and Astrals doesn't help.

If they had some dmods but competent officers and 50% more ships they'd be a lot tougher.

If going that hard into quality gave them S-Mods then maybe it wouldn't be so bad.

2

General Discussion / Re: Gonna rename this ship 'Lucky 7s'

« on: April 19, 2024, 05:25:06 AM »

Seven!

3

Blog Posts / Re: Save/Load UI, Autosave, Intel Map Markers, and More

« on: April 18, 2024, 11:23:02 AM »

Just finished reading the thread and blogpost. Oh my god this was a minor annoyance of me, wanting to keep track of a good chunk of things but being unable to do so. Now i won't have to forget anymore! And probably i will start putting marks on any star systems that are good for slipsurge when i unlock that on my runs too. Is there a Log limit?

4

General Discussion / Re: [Poll] Migrating the unofficial wiki from Fandom to wiki.gg

« on: March 22, 2024, 06:01:37 AM »

Jump ship and never return to that place. Hell, minecraft wiki people made a plugin that redirects fandom links to new wiki or something.

5

Blog Posts / Re: Simulator Enhancements

« on: March 14, 2024, 02:13:52 PM »

Just give it a souped up version of our autoloader?

6

Blog Posts / Re: Simulator Enhancements

« on: March 14, 2024, 08:16:24 AM »

Sim being not an accurate metric for actual combat was kind of annoying so i greatly appreciate this change so i don't get the pain of my ship builds not being as good as i expected and having to get around going back to base eventually to try a new configuration.
The on by default AI officer limit tied to your cores is cute and it gives an use for them on those instances i am just hoarding them like a dragon because i haven't found an use for them yet.
Oh will you be able to simulate stations? Would be nice if you could.

7

General Discussion / Re: How would you build a Wolf in 0.97a?

« on: March 10, 2024, 07:20:06 AM »

Wolves are pretty exceptional frigates for 5 DP imo.

Well that can't be entirely true because Glimmer exists.

Glimmer needs a specific skill to use though.

8

General Discussion / Re: Neural link Paragons?

« on: March 05, 2024, 07:27:27 AM »

Most capitals only really need two elite skills and you're generally better off with the OP instead.
This also would require you to pilot a paragon, which is questionable at best.
Having a paragon as your NL slave so you can pilot a brilliant isn't the worst thing ever and it feels less silly than having a throwaway frigate for the same job, but it certainly doesn't feel optimal.

Theoretically if you fully lean into NL you should have in your hands T W O turboboosted ships that leave any officer up to [HYPER REDACTED] in the dust.

Cores are unusable now because they can't have cautious personalities. Player ghosts are fortunately based on fleet doctrine, but again flying bricks only really care about flux and armor so most of the extra skills don't really matter.

You are supposed to kill your enemy anyways it's fine

9

General Discussion / Re: Neural link Paragons?

« on: March 04, 2024, 07:54:27 PM »

Theoretically if you fully lean into NL you should have in your hands T W O turboboosted ships that leave any officer up to [HYPER REDACTED] in the dust. Think about it.
Combat: Any 5 or more if you decide to not fully invest in other trees
Tech: Gunnery implants, Energy weapon mastery, Cybernetic augmentation (should work extremely well on this build if both linked ships count as flagships if you don't go for automated ships)
>Leadership: No flagship skills.
>Industry: Ordinance expertise, Polarized armor
Not sure if it is optimal but conceptually it is cool.

10

General Discussion / Re: new phase is absolutely horrible

« on: March 04, 2024, 01:17:47 PM »

If it likes to go fast you go Adaptive. If it doesn't Anchor.

11

General Discussion / Re: Galatia Academy stipend

« on: February 21, 2024, 11:41:01 PM »

More specifically it is command then on the income tab. It also says how many months you have left.

12

Suggestions / Re: +2 comm sniffers without getting cleared out from BOTB

« on: February 21, 2024, 05:54:02 AM »

feels like it fits more with electronic warfare

13

General Discussion / Re: Need help tracking down a specific mod

« on: February 21, 2024, 05:33:46 AM »

And the mod is?
Someone might find this thread years later.

14

Announcements / Re: Starsector 0.97a (Released) Patch Notes

« on: February 20, 2024, 12:17:35 PM »

Officer management was already unpopular apparently anyways

15

General Discussion / How 2 equip a Gemini?

« on: February 19, 2024, 05:06:25 AM »

I felt like adding an Astral to my fleet and as a result i went to put some points on the carrier skills but an astral alone doesn't hit the cap so i decided to add two Geminis fill those slots because reserve redeployment i get to have 2 more wings without them counting towards the softcap. But now i am kinda stumped on what to use Escort package might be interesting on them i suppose but other than that i feel pretty clueless for some reason.
Anyone have any ideas?