The Shrike: "Certain unique structural elements in the plasma venting system are known to, which wear, corrode in oxygen-rich atmospheres, so care must be taken to re-apply ceramopolymer coating at each hull servicing."
3 things. 'Which' is probably meant to be 'with'. 'Re-apply ceramopolymer coating' sounds odd, maybe it should be 're-apply its ceramopolymer coating'. Lastly, I wouldn't have thought a ship-to-ship combat Destroyer would be atmosphere-capable, which makes the oxygen-rich atmosphere sentence a bit off. Even if it were I can't imagine Shrikes spend a lot of time in atmospheres.
...
A few that aren't typos, but just don't flow well when read:
Perdition Bomber: "Great faith is required to pilot this haphazard vehicle into battle because its survivability stats should dissuade any rational crew." Sentence structure is odd: I would split it in two, "Great faith is required to pilot this haphazard vehicle. Its survivability stats should dissuade any rational crew."
Hammer-class torpedo: the first sentence about its ubiquity and civilian applications was added when Daggers used Hammers, to explain why military-grade bombers used asteroid poppers. It's not needed anymore and IMO ruins the next sentence which is a much better opening: "The go-to strike weapon of the desperately under-equipped..."
...
The first paragraph of every description is treated differently as a concise, usually mechanic-based descriptor for a ship/weapon, with lore spiels coming after. This seems to becoming more inconsistent, with some descriptions beginning with a paragraph of lore which then appears on ships/weapons as its concise description.