Fractal Softworks Forum
November 17, 2018, 02:26:41 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Starsector 0.9a is out! (11/16/18)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: No ship system should be finite.  (Read 2164 times)
j01
Lieutenant
**
Posts: 90


View Profile
« on: August 11, 2012, 01:14:00 AM »

Even flares and especially drones should at least slowly regenerate their stock over time, back to the initial amount.

Ship systems are now integral to gameplay, and really should have a constant presence in combat. This seems no more poignant than in the case of the ships with drones, where the supply often runs dry fairly quickly even in light combat, and then the ship is crippled with minimal effort for however much longer the battle goes on.

I love the concept of drones, but I can't justify using the ships that get them when other ships have the overwhelming, infinite tactical superiority of reusable systems.

I'd rather this weren't the case.
Logged
Hyph_K31
Admiral
*****
Posts: 1605


O' Hear My Name and Tremble! Ug Ug.


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 11, 2012, 01:18:15 AM »

I can agree with you point on the drones, as you would expect a ship like the apogee to be able to produce more. although ships like the gemini would not, because there wouldn't be enough room inside for a drone 'factory'.

As for the flares, I think they're fine. although they could use a little more ammo - for prolonged fights. and anyway, ballistic weapons have a large presence in combat, and they have finite ammo. all that means it that you've got to be a little bit more careful when and what you shoot at.
Logged


"GEDUNE, stop venting in front of your classmates!"
Reshy
Admiral
*****
Posts: 1042


White


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: August 11, 2012, 03:23:45 AM »

I can agree with you point on the drones, as you would expect a ship like the apogee to be able to produce more. although ships like the gemini would not, because there wouldn't be enough room inside for a drone 'factory'.

As for the flares, I think they're fine. although they could use a little more ammo - for prolonged fights. and anyway, ballistic weapons have a large presence in combat, and they have finite ammo. all that means it that you've got to be a little bit more careful when and what you shoot at.


Gemini has a flight deck, so why not?
Logged
Hyph_K31
Admiral
*****
Posts: 1605


O' Hear My Name and Tremble! Ug Ug.


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 11, 2012, 03:30:48 AM »

Thats a flight deck, not a production line. It might be able to repair and replace fighters - but from what i've been told before, it already has a number of spare fighters (of an unknown number) - that doesn't mean to say that it also has to ability to replace drones, sure it can repair and there are spares. but I don't think it would be able to produce more.
Logged


"GEDUNE, stop venting in front of your classmates!"
j01
Lieutenant
**
Posts: 90


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: August 11, 2012, 04:45:50 AM »

I don't think it would be able to produce more.

Only the game designers can speak for the lore, so it's irrelevant to discuss.

My point is that it should be able to produce more, because gameplay.
Logged
TJJ
Admiral
*****
Posts: 1703



View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: August 11, 2012, 07:11:12 AM »

I agree.
Even with unlimited supplies I don't think drones or flares would be that impressive.

Skimmers/Teleporters on the other hand... they're most definitely edging toward the ROFLstomp IMBA classification.
Logged
IIE16 Yoshi
Admiral
*****
Posts: 558


Banned

View Profile
« Reply #6 on: August 11, 2012, 07:19:33 AM »

I think with something like flares, maybe the ability to 'reload' them. I.E, you can burn through the stack of flares you have after which the flares start to 'cool down' much like weapons do after firing. After this cooldown is complete, you can go crazy with the flares again. The idea of 'magazines' in ballistic weapons is something I'd very much like to see. While some energy weapons have the ability to constantly recharge new shots, a ballistic weapon would need to reload a new magazine. Hull mods or ship systems with the ability to reduce this 'cool down' could also be introduced.
Logged

Xareh
Admiral
*****
Posts: 2058


It's been one of those days...


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: August 11, 2012, 07:23:35 AM »

Skimmers/teleporters are not using anything other than reactor power I think, so they would regen.

But if you say that flares should regen then why not ballistic weapons themselves? Or missiles? It makes sense for drones but not flares.
Logged

Changes as of May 24, 2013
  • Reinvented Starsector.
  • That is all.
IIE16 Yoshi
Admiral
*****
Posts: 558


Banned

View Profile
« Reply #8 on: August 11, 2012, 07:38:26 AM »

Skimmers/teleporters are not using anything other than reactor power I think, so they would regen.

But if you say that flares should regen then why not ballistic weapons themselves? Or missiles? It makes sense for drones but not flares.

I think with something like flares, maybe the ability to 'reload' them. I.E, you can burn through the stack of flares you have after which the flares start to 'cool down' much like weapons do after firing. After this cooldown is complete, you can go crazy with the flares again. The idea of 'magazines' in ballistic weapons is something I'd very much like to see. While some energy weapons have the ability to constantly recharge new shots, a ballistic weapon would need to reload a new magazine. Hull mods or ship systems with the ability to reduce this 'cool down' could also be introduced.
But I did~.....
Logged

TJJ
Admiral
*****
Posts: 1703



View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: August 11, 2012, 07:53:35 AM »

Skimmers/teleporters are not using anything other than reactor power I think, so they would regen.

But if you say that flares should regen then why not ballistic weapons themselves? Or missiles? It makes sense for drones but not flares.

There's nothing to stop flares being energy weapons that don't require 'ammo' (in fact, that's precisely how they're implemented at the moment if you encounter the 'flares in the shop' bug!)

There are lots of infinite ammo energy weapons that *should* require reaction mass; plasma cannon, pulse lasers, heavy blasters, but for gameplay reasons they don't.
Logged
Plasmatic
Captain
****
Posts: 469


Curious no?


View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: August 11, 2012, 09:35:32 AM »

it's fairly easy for you to make all system regen back to the inital amount,

Just edit the ship_systems.csv found in Starfarer/data/shipsystems

theres a column that is regen. i find 0.1 or 0.2 to be a good value there, not too fast, and not too slow.
Logged

"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt"
- Abraham Lincoln
phyrex
Admiral
*****
Posts: 751



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: August 12, 2012, 01:48:35 PM »

it's fairly easy for you to make all system regen back to the inital amount,

Just edit the ship_systems.csv found in Starfarer/data/shipsystems

theres a column that is regen. i find 0.1 or 0.2 to be a good value there, not too fast, and not too slow.

but that would be an unoficial, user made fix. he's talking about future balance of the game overall
Logged
MidnightSun
Commander
***
Posts: 203



View Profile WWW
« Reply #12 on: August 13, 2012, 10:20:15 AM »

I do agree that having a (very slowly) regenerating stock of drones would be very useful. If for balance's sake that means cutting the total number of deployable drones for the Gemini/Astral/Apogee, that would be fine, I think.

As for flares, I think it should continue to be limited. Missiles are highly limited, and given how effective flares are as a counter to missiles, they should be limited as well.
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!