Fractal Softworks Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: rename Escort order to Protect  (Read 3931 times)

TheWetFish

  • Commander
  • ***
  • Posts: 131
    • View Profile
rename Escort order to Protect
« on: July 26, 2018, 10:36:10 AM »

"Protect" would be a more accurately descriptive word, as Escort is very often being confused for a follow or cooperate intent. 

The functionality of Escort is great, just looking for a name change to make it's usage more obvious.  "Bodyguard" may also suitable. 
Logged

The Soldier

  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 3740
  • Quartermaster
    • View Profile
Re: rename Escort order to Protect
« Reply #1 on: July 26, 2018, 01:20:57 PM »

The military, naval term for a ship protecting another ship is an escort.  As space combat usually follows the same theory as naval combat, they borrow a lot of terms.
Logged
Quote from: Trylobot
I am officially an epoch.
Quote from: Thaago
Note: please sacrifice your goats responsibly, look up the proper pronunciation of Alex's name. We wouldn't want some other project receiving mystic power.

Sy

  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 1225
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: rename Escort order to Protect
« Reply #2 on: July 26, 2018, 01:35:59 PM »

i'd appreciate that, yeah.

The military, naval term for a ship protecting another ship is an escort.  As space combat usually follows the same theory as naval combat, they borrow a lot of terms.
correct military term or not, it is counterintuitive for a lot of players that telling a small ship to "escort" a big one will usually decrease the survival chance of the small one. renaming the order to "protect" would make it a lot clearer that the ordered ship will actively try to, well, protect its target -- even potentially at the cost of risking its own death -- rather than just follow its target around and providing some additional firepower, or covering the big ship's rear.
« Last Edit: July 26, 2018, 01:37:47 PM by Sy »
Logged

The Soldier

  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 3740
  • Quartermaster
    • View Profile
Re: rename Escort order to Protect
« Reply #3 on: July 26, 2018, 03:41:47 PM »

I don't see how it's counterintuitive?  To the player, the Escort order tells the ordered ship to guard and follow the target vessel.  In fact, escort vessels during wartime are supposed to put themselves between the friendly ship and the enemy rather than hanging around providing additional firepower.  Destroyers escorting the Atlantic convoys actively put themselves between the merchant ships and U-Boats that came in wolf packs.  Battleships often escorted aircraft carriers as well in the Pacific, an example of a much larger ship escorting a smaller one.

So the term "Escort" still applies well to the role that it's supposed to do.
Logged
Quote from: Trylobot
I am officially an epoch.
Quote from: Thaago
Note: please sacrifice your goats responsibly, look up the proper pronunciation of Alex's name. We wouldn't want some other project receiving mystic power.

SafariJohn

  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 1797
    • View Profile
Re: rename Escort order to Protect
« Reply #4 on: July 26, 2018, 04:18:06 PM »

The problem is that Starsector pretty strictly follows the "tougher is slower" formula. Therefore the tough ships you want escorting can't keep up with the fragile ships that need the support. If there were a "Support" or whatever order - where the chosen ship follows the target ship around and hides behind the target ship when high on flux - I think it would get a lot of use. But that's been suggested multiple times before to no avail.
Logged

TaLaR

  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 2247
    • View Profile
Re: rename Escort order to Protect
« Reply #5 on: July 26, 2018, 10:51:30 PM »

Yeah, separate Support (assist, hide behind ally when threatened) vs Protect (actively defend ally, risk if necessary) would be nice.
And maybe Cooperate (act as group, but don't select any single ship as leader).

telling a small ship to "escort" a big one will usually decrease the survival chance of the small one.

That's the problematic part. And it's not like you can order big one to escort small one to compensate (since it's usually slower). Which is why I prefer 'defend area' orders when threat from enemy fleet is significant.
Logged

Sy

  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 1225
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: rename Escort order to Protect
« Reply #6 on: July 27, 2018, 09:16:54 AM »

I don't see how it's counterintuitive?  To the player, the Escort order tells the ordered ship to guard and follow the target vessel.  In fact, escort vessels during wartime are supposed to put themselves between the friendly ship and the enemy rather than hanging around providing additional firepower.
because not everyone knows the exact terminology used by real life military? regardless of how correct it is, i've seen it several times that someone in chat (usually a pretty new player) was confused by how the escort command actually works. i also initially thought it simply told the ordered ship to stick close to the target, without any additional change in behaviour over two not-escorting ships fighting near each other.
Logged

The Soldier

  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 3740
  • Quartermaster
    • View Profile
Re: rename Escort order to Protect
« Reply #7 on: July 27, 2018, 01:06:43 PM »

You don't need to know exact military terminology in order to know what an Escort order is supposed to mean.  Protect the target - not difficult to figure out considering you just selected one ship and clicked another friendly ship with that intent.  Changing the name will not change what people think the order is supposed to do - you need something else for that, like a tooltip or otherwise, to make sure the player knows exactly what it does.

I'm of the mindset that the play should be able to find things out on their own, that not everything should be given to the player without any sort of figuring out to do.  As far as my opinion goes I think it's fine that the player has to learn some new things.
« Last Edit: July 27, 2018, 01:16:44 PM by The Soldier »
Logged
Quote from: Trylobot
I am officially an epoch.
Quote from: Thaago
Note: please sacrifice your goats responsibly, look up the proper pronunciation of Alex's name. We wouldn't want some other project receiving mystic power.

intrinsic_parity

  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 1469
    • View Profile
Re: rename Escort order to Protect
« Reply #8 on: July 27, 2018, 03:36:02 PM »

For me, it's not so much about understanding what it does but rather that it causes unintuitive and occasionally suicidal behavior. Slow ships will turn their unshielded engines to the enemy to try and catch up with fast ships they are escorting, small ships will jump in front of huge amounts of fire power as if they can shield tank for their escortee when in fact they just die instantly. It's not that the player doesn't understand that the escorting ship will try to protect the escortee, it's that certain ships will act in ridiculous and suicidal ways when told to protect other ships, which is not intuitive. It needs to be fixed, not better explained.
Logged

c plus one

  • Commander
  • ***
  • Posts: 150
  • 'Make Jumpgates Great Again'
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: rename Escort order to Protect
« Reply #9 on: July 28, 2018, 08:04:44 PM »

It's not that the player doesn't understand that the escorting ship will try to protect the escortee, it's that certain ships will act in ridiculous and suicidal ways when told to protect other ships, which is not intuitive. It needs to be fixed, not better explained.

Emphasis mine. A decisive fix to that will significantly help. I'm increasingly frustrated by the current highly counterproductive behaviour in-game.
Logged
Quote from: Lopunny Zen
you are playing them wrong then..

Don't tell me I'm playing anything wrong in a singleplayer sandbox game. Just don't.

TheWetFish

  • Commander
  • ***
  • Posts: 131
    • View Profile
Re: rename Escort order to Protect
« Reply #10 on: August 07, 2018, 04:40:46 AM »

Escort is 100% the strictly correct & descriptive definition to use.  It is also the term that should not be used.  Language is only as useful as the shared understanding of it 


Unfortunately the presumption that many/most players will have a full & strictly accurately understanding of the term "escort" is proving to be incorrect in a sufficient number of cases that a change should be considered 

If we want this game to be usable by a wide audience then we need to use language fitting of a wide audience 

Another option would be a suitably descriptive tooltip for the Escort command which serves to provide the necessary shared understanding of the term.  I don't think this is preferable but it's probably worth considering 


As a side note there are some interesting AI behaviors associated with the Escort command.  Unless the functionality of the command was radically changed (which I am not advocating), then distinct prompts or suggestions to change the associated AI behavior may be better & more cleanly handled in a distinct thread
Logged

The Soldier

  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 3740
  • Quartermaster
    • View Profile
Re: rename Escort order to Protect
« Reply #11 on: August 07, 2018, 01:13:56 PM »

Escort is 100% the strictly correct & descriptive definition to use.  It is also the term that should not be used.  Language is only as useful as the shared understanding of it
I fail to see how renaming an ability from "Escort" to "Protect" in a very, very naval-centric game will actually make it any more understandable.  If anything people will wonder why it's not named Escort, or why the name got changed in the first place.  Furthermore, this game doesn't exactly promote itself towards a wide audience in the first place with it's design (which is perfectly fine in and of itself), so changing language for for the sake of understanding won't change much, if anything, at all.  Finally, it's not as if the term "Escort" requires extensive military knowledge to understand it means "follow and protect".

As far as I'm concerned this is a completely unnecessary change.
Logged
Quote from: Trylobot
I am officially an epoch.
Quote from: Thaago
Note: please sacrifice your goats responsibly, look up the proper pronunciation of Alex's name. We wouldn't want some other project receiving mystic power.

TheWetFish

  • Commander
  • ***
  • Posts: 131
    • View Profile
Re: rename Escort order to Protect
« Reply #12 on: August 09, 2018, 05:15:07 AM »

We seem to be understanding each others points quite well, while factually disagreeing on the scope of audience where "Escort" is problematic 

I am basing this on the (restricted sample size of) feedback received via the Discord chat 
Logged

Wyvern

  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 2554
    • View Profile
Re: rename Escort order to Protect
« Reply #13 on: August 09, 2018, 10:46:34 AM »

Escort, in common context, simply means 'to go with'.  If a police officer escorts you somewhere, do you expect them to take a bullet for you?  What if you're escorting a friend to a party?

There's also a significant difference between real naval tactics and what works in-game; in the real world, you'd expect an escorting cruiser or destroyer to put itself between an attack and the aircraft carrier... but the real world doesn't have shields, among various other differences that make that behavior problematic in-game.

Regardless of whether the current 'Escort' command gets renamed or not, though, there is definitely a need for a distinct command that encompasses "Stay near this target ship, try to avoid being between it and what it's shooting at, and otherwise just do your own thing."
Logged
Wyvern is 100% correct about the math.

Techhead

  • Commander
  • ***
  • Posts: 184
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: rename Escort order to Protect
« Reply #14 on: August 10, 2018, 02:59:14 AM »

Regardless of whether the current 'Escort' command gets renamed or not, though, there is definitely a need for a distinct command that encompasses "Stay near this target ship, try to avoid being between it and what it's shooting at, and otherwise just do your own thing."
But I don't want it to just hang around and do it's own thing. I want it to (prefer to) shoot at whatever the followed ship is shooting at. (Link is to an earlier topic on this subject. Have another.)
Logged
Pages: [1] 2