"Freedom" bundle but the proceeds go to ACLU? Oh the irony...
I know I might regret asking this, but: What's wrong with the ACLU?
ACLU defends vehemently constitutional rights, except when it comes to the the Second Amendment. ACLU's official position is that the Second Amendment protects a collective right rather than individual right, which is both at odds with the Supreme Court decision United States v. Miller and linguistically ignorant. "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State" is a nominative absolute that when removed, does not damage the grammatical integrity of the sentence nor does it change the meaning the sentence conveys. The main subject is "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms", which says nothing about collective needs (maintaining a militia).
They do vehemently fight to protect the 2cd amendment as they see it (which is a fairly moderate position that both the left and the right are unhappy with, which I find funny). They have teamed up with the NRA before to protect gun owners when the legal details align with their own viewpoint. From wikipedia:
The national ACLU's position is that the Second Amendment protects a collective right to own guns, rather than an individual right despite the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. Heller that the Second Amendment is an individual right. The national organization's position is based on the phrases "a well regulated Militia" and "the security of a free State". However, the ACLU opposes any effort to create a registry of gun owners and has worked with the National Rifle Association to prevent a registry from being created and has favored protecting the right to carry guns under the 4th Amendment.
And here is an old article about one of the cases:
Link!(I apologize for not finding the case itself, but I'm not a lawyer so google is good enough for me.)
Other than their interpretation of the 2cd amendment, it seems you approve of the work that the ACLU does, so I'm a bit confused by your initial comment. They are one of the few organizations in the US that I think honestly defend the freedom of its citizens, regardless of politics. They have their own interpretation of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, and I don't agree with that interpretation in all cases, but they are diligent and open about what they do.
Also, I would like to congratulate the forum: The 2cd Amendment was mentioned and the conversation is still polite. This may be the first time ever!