Fractal Softworks Forum
October 24, 2014, 02:30:45 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Starsector 0.65a is out!
 
  Home Help Search Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
1  Starsector / General Discussion / Re: My 0.65 RC-1 Fleet on: October 23, 2014, 07:36:06 PM
The fleet:


The method:

Deploy the weaponless monitor, ISS Bastion. Fortress shield up. Gather all enemies to me and tank them.

Deploy 1-3 medusas depending on size and strength of enemy forces.

Wait for medusas to arrive together. 90% of the time they choose the same target on the periphery of my tanking circle since they deployed simultaneously and begin pelting it with heavy blasters (formerly pulse lasers + antimatter blasters) until it is dead.

Weave around enemies to position them in a line so they won't fire on me if necessary, while staying close enough to keep their attention, and toggle fortress shield on and off to regain flux. This step is unnecessary against forces that don't have multiple cruisers or a capital ship + backup.

Repeat until medusas have picked off each enemy.

Win.

If anything escaped, the tempest chases it down and finishes it with superior speed and extreme prejudice.

If any ship remains intact, the venerable ISS Sudoku shuttles on over for a suicide marine rush, if desired.


This works well. I have even successfully taken on fleets with an onslaught + cruisers and destroyers and more, albeit with significant damage done to the poor, silly AI medusas. I met my match with this setup in the form of a fleet with two onslaughts deployed simultaneously, as my poor monitor could not keep the attention of enough of their combined guns to save stupid medusas from lowering their shields instead of backing off, and getting exploded.
2  Starsector / Bug Reports & Support / [0.65a RC1] Game crash on refit simulation with deleted variant. on: October 23, 2014, 06:14:09 PM
I was running a custom medusa variant I named "Heavy", decided to refit after leveling up, deleted the old variant, adding some new things, but it was still called "[Heavy] Medusa" in the variant name box, and the game crashes to desktop consistently when I try to run a simulation while the ship is still named after the previously saved but now deleted variant.

log dump:

Code:
7054422 [Thread-5] ERROR com.fs.starfarer.combat.D  - java.lang.RuntimeException: Ship hull variant [exported_variant_medusa_311f1ebd-540a-4606-8521-b32f2f5133c1] not found!
java.lang.RuntimeException: Ship hull variant [exported_variant_medusa_311f1ebd-540a-4606-8521-b32f2f5133c1] not found!
at com.fs.starfarer.loading.O00O.super(Unknown Source)
at com.fs.starfarer.loading.SpecStore.super(Unknown Source)
at com.fs.starfarer.campaign.fleet.FleetMember.new.super$String(Unknown Source)
at com.fs.starfarer.campaign.fleet.FleetMember.o00000(Unknown Source)
at com.fs.starfarer.campaign.fleet.FleetMember.<init>(Unknown Source)
at com.fs.starfarer.campaign.fleet.FleetMember.<init>(Unknown Source)
at com.fs.starfarer.coreui.refit.do.interface.Object$super(Unknown Source)
at com.fs.starfarer.coreui.refit.do.actionPerformed(Unknown Source)
at com.fs.starfarer.ui.OOO0OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.o00000(Unknown Source)
at com.fs.starfarer.ui.H.processInput(Unknown Source)
at com.fs.starfarer.ui.O0Oo.o00000(Unknown Source)
at com.fs.starfarer.OoOO.Oôo000(Unknown Source)
at com.fs.super.A.Ò00000(Unknown Source)
at com.fs.starfarer.combat.D.super(Unknown Source)
at com.fs.starfarer.StarfarerLauncher$2.run(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)

3  Starsector / General Discussion / Re: RAGE AGAINST THE PATROL!!! on: October 23, 2014, 04:09:27 PM
I think it is so expensive right now because if you go straight to the black market to sell legal goods that would avoid tariffs, so the authorities need another way to drain your money so the black market is not OP.

I think maybe inspection frequency and severity of fees incurred should be based (more? is it a factor at all right now?) heavily on system stability and smuggling activity.

If a system is more stable than not and there's little or no smuggling being done, these legalized shakedowns should be much, much rarer, and the toll should be absolutely tiny compared to what it is right now.

Legal traders already have to face enormous tariffs, after all.

Hell, maybe there should be a reputation stat that ties your history of legal trading and helping out with shortages in each system with your faction standing, and should count for or against you with this kind of stuff.

"Hey, I scanned your cargo and it all looks good. We usually charge for this kind of thing, but you're a dear friend to the Hegemony, and the books also say you rescued planet A and B from starvation with your onion shipments! My wife lives on planet B! My god, someone give this man a medal."
4  Starsector / General Discussion / Re: My 0.65 RC-1 Fleet on: October 22, 2014, 08:26:13 PM
I'd love to see some single-ship bounties in the future where the enemy is just one dude in a big heavily customized ship being a menace that must be stopped.

Imagine getting that big fat 250k payoff only if you can manage to defeat some legendary captain of an overclocked paragon.
5  Starsector / General Discussion / Re: My 0.65 RC-1 Fleet on: October 22, 2014, 07:03:52 PM
Cash in hand: 3,017,642

Fleet:
  • 1xOnslaught
  • 1xDominator
  • 2xEnforcer
  • 2xMedua
  • 1xHammerhead
  • 1xGemini
  • 1xWolf
  • 4xAssorted fighter/bomber

...
Is highly profitable: Check
...


How in pluperfect hell is a fleet that big "highly profitable"? In fact, how is it not just one gigantic neverending money sink?

How are there enough supplies and fuel in the universe to support a fleet that big?

Do you just stay in one system all the time? If so, how do you turn a profit when there aren't any bounties (most of the time)? Do you just wait around at one port or another, speeding up time, waiting for bounties? Is one of the systems capable of producing half enough supplies to keep a fleet that big afloat?

I can't find out how to make it worth having a single cruiser class ship, even just by itself, due to a combination of the expense and lack of availability of supplies and fuel, and lack of constant , decent money source within a single system.
6  Starsector / Announcements / Re: Starsector 0.65a (Released) Patch Notes on: October 21, 2014, 10:46:30 PM
Are you sure? There's code specifically to abort the inspection if the player jumps out before they get the notification about the scan, and as far as I can see, it seems to work. Can you describe exactly the sequence of events?

Yes, I'm positive of what I saw.

I was near a Hegemony patrol when I arrived at the warp thingy, clicked the text option to enter warp, and afterwards while my fleet was just kind of fading out while on top of the gate, the hegemony patrol emitted its pinging pulse thing, and then I appeared in warp in time to see the "you lost faction!" message.


I also recently chased down a single pirate ship, some kind of smuggler, engaged it, used the "pursue" option, ran it down, destroyed it, and when I came out of combat I saw a notice of losing -156 faction with independents, and since the game was paused, I got to see that the now empty pirate fleet (of one ship) I had just killed had turned independent after I engaged it.
7  Starsector / Announcements / Re: Starsector 0.65a (Released) Patch Notes on: October 21, 2014, 03:24:21 PM
Dunno if it was already mentioned, but you can get pinged for scans after you've already put in the command to enter a warp gate, causing you to lose faction standing without being able to take any action to prevent it. People should be able to tell when the irreversible process of starting up the warp drive has begun, and know better than to expect you to sit still for a scan when it is impossible. Better that than making it possbile but only a tiny window of split-second-reflex-game-pausing to interrupt your warp jump so you can get scanned, if you ask me.
8  Starsector / Announcements / Re: Starsector 0.65a (Released) Patch Notes on: October 21, 2014, 10:30:34 AM
I'd just like to comment about something that might be a bit old news to some, but new news to me, as of this version.

It's a lot of text that looks negative at first glance, so I'll just preface by mentioning that the end result of what I'm about to say is 100% praise, and the wall that follows is to put it all into perspective.

I haven't played this game since before the CR stuff went in, and I've put it off since I heard about it because I absolutely did not like the idea behind the mechanic. I've always been the type of person who most enjoys getting stuck into a game, immersing myself, and going very, very slowly, deliberately, and doing my best to cheat or circumvent the system in order to prolong my gameplay experience in every way possible. That might not make sense, but I'll put it this way- in Starsector, I really, really loved extremely long battles. A lot of times this meant getting the fastest ships and kiting around enemies that were way too big and tough, and that I shouldn't have normally been able to take on. Other times it meant investing everything in a fleet of the most durable and defensive ships possible with weapons that don't rely on ammo, and outlasting the enemies, often with the goal of defeating them in very long engagements where, as a result, I ended up winning without taking any hull or even armor damage. I'm the kind of person who doesn't use consumables in games where it's at all possible to win without them, even (especially) if it means extra grinding to make up or even far surpass the difference, which I greatly enjoy. I always go for unlimited attack methods and resources, even if it means they'd be far weaker than limited alternatives. My greatest joy in gaming is almost always the ability to play indefinitely without stopping, or with as few stops and extra steps of maintenance as possible. I hate item durability. I hate time limits. I hate escort quests where my success hinges on an uncontrollable factor that I can't grind to make up for.

As of this most recent update, I've finally tried the game again, fully expecting to be disappointed by all the new limiting factors both in combat and out.

I was very pleasantly surprised.

The CR system and the way supplies are required and used seems to work just exactly right. It's not even just that I don't mind them. I actually enjoy their inclusion in the game. It almost feels like some kind of rare balance has been struck, where those factors are implemented so smoothly with the gameplay that even I can't help but feel motivated by them, rather than bogged down.

CR drop during combat, especially after prior recent battles, and all that it entails, seems to only serve to make each new fight more tense. The handicaps and risks of rapidly dropping CR are gradual enough that it really just feels like a longer battle has all the more at stake, which is exhilarating. Suddenly, a grueling battle against already overwhelming odds (granted, I've only played as one or two frigates going up against bigger and deadlier forces so far) becomes all the more desperate when that CR timer ticks down and the alarm sounds.

It's difficult to describe, but if someone with my extreme preferences for non-limited gaming mechanics finds them compelling, then you guys must have done something very, very right, or at least are on the right track.

Also, The sound effects seem to have largely changed since the last time I played. I liked them fine before, but they're better by leaps and bounds now. Kudos all around.
9  Other / Discussions / Re: FTL on: September 13, 2012, 05:04:32 PM
Oh, what do we have here?

Yeah, FTL releases tomorrow, and I'm super excited to see how it goes.

I tossed $100 at the kickstarter for both this, and Star Command (the second kickstarter, for PC port), and I've been following them every step of the way.

I knew I wanted to support them from the moment I saw their first video presentations. What's not to love?

On a somewhat related note, I became horribly depressed when I found out that I missed the chance to support the Two Guys SpaceVenture (http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/spaceventure/two-guys-spaceventure-by-the-creators-of-space-que). I loved the Space Quest series dearly.

Oh well. At least it got funded without my help Wink
10  Starsector / General Discussion / Re: i realized something today! on: August 15, 2012, 05:52:04 AM
Personally, I was immediately reminded of overheating and flushing coolant in the Mechwarrior games.

IIRC, energy weapons caused the most heat in those games as well.
11  Starsector / Suggestions / Re: No ship system should be finite. on: August 11, 2012, 04:45:50 AM
I don't think it would be able to produce more.

Only the game designers can speak for the lore, so it's irrelevant to discuss.

My point is that it should be able to produce more, because gameplay.
12  Starsector / Suggestions / No ship system should be finite. on: August 11, 2012, 01:14:00 AM
Even flares and especially drones should at least slowly regenerate their stock over time, back to the initial amount.

Ship systems are now integral to gameplay, and really should have a constant presence in combat. This seems no more poignant than in the case of the ships with drones, where the supply often runs dry fairly quickly even in light combat, and then the ship is crippled with minimal effort for however much longer the battle goes on.

I love the concept of drones, but I can't justify using the ships that get them when other ships have the overwhelming, infinite tactical superiority of reusable systems.

I'd rather this weren't the case.
13  Starsector / General Discussion / Re: Stagnant Development on: August 05, 2012, 10:19:22 PM
I read the thread title and the first post, and I don't think it's necessary to even skim through the rest of this thread.

If this isn't a joke, which it really looks like to anyone who's semi-regularly paid attention to Starfarer's development and has even the loosest grasp on average development cycles, especially for indie games with small teams, then shame on you. Shame on you for not knowing better.

The dev team's communication with the community has been impeccable. The rate of progress has been astounding. At no point since this website was accessible to the general public has this not been the case.

This has been so blatantly, objectively obvious that I can only conclude that the OP has fallen victim to a sort of confirmation bias, where they only care about updates and communication concerning one or two aspects of the game they find particularly interesting(campaign features?), while progress and information about all other areas are ignored and considered wasted time, despite their fundamental importance in the scope of the project as a whole, and in game design in general.

It just isn't an apple pie without the crust, even if all *you* care about is the filling, and Alex is making this one from scratch, so he must first invent the universe, you see?
14  Starsector / General Discussion / Re: .53a First impressions on: August 05, 2012, 09:51:19 PM
I feel like ramming your unshielded ship into another ship's shields at high speed should result in crazy huge amounts of kinetic damage, more than any weapon, especially depending on your ship's mass.

It makes sense, and it could be an even more interesting risk vs. reward dynamic especially in the case of burn drives.
15  Starsector / General Discussion / Re: Am I the only one who thinks the Hyperion is overpowered? on: August 04, 2012, 07:18:47 PM
It does feel pretty strong with the teleporting, yeah, but my only real concern, personally, is the quick point capturing. It probably shouldn't outperform interceptors so utterly.

It'd likely work to just require a fairly long initial chargeup/startup time before the teleport system works normally right at the Hyperion's deployment.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!