Starsector 0.97a is out! (02/02/24); New blog post: Save/Load UI, Autosave, Intel Map Markers, and More (04/10/24)
Interesting... and yeah, I can see something like the Hyperion getting a "Hangar Queen" built-in hull mod that just makes it cost some supplies even at idle...Let's NOT give him any more ideas on how to nerf that poor thing
1) Removed "emergency repairs" and LR providing a supply repair bonus. Ships have a base (hull size based) repair rate instead. This rate is hidden; the UI shows how many days are left instead of what % is being gained per day.What is the difference between these two? Does CR now regen faster?
...
Logistics rating now provides a bonus/penalty to the repair rate, in addition to the standard max CR penalty. Also provides a slight bonus to max CR. "Fleet Repairs" now increase the repair rate. "Automated Repair Unit" also increase the repair rate.
What about the system?Without using something like netbeans or something like it, is it possible to "rip out" certain ships of your mods? I like the firepower that this ship brings to the low tech AI fleets and would like to keep it in a personal mod
Just copy the entry from ship-hulls csv and the hull file, sprite, and variants.
Yeah, giving the player a choice in these situation is usually the best choice- The extra supplies can not only be spent on emergency repairs, but also on CR regeneration. Would make a per-ship "suspend CR regeneration" option even more necessary than it already is, though.
I would assume this one. If you're character's logistical capability is his/her ability to coordinate his/her fleet, then getting their ships back up to fighting shape would be top priority.
EDIT: Actually, I take that back. It would be really cool to have an in-game selection on how extra logicistical capacity would benefit you. Maybe a choice between extra burn rating, repair speed, or CR regen.
And swamp gas! Don't forget the swamp gas!You can't comment on those space station sprites you made, and we've all seen?
Pretty sure those are, uh, weather balloons? Yeah.
Salvaged enough rolands to outfit my Sajuuk-Khar and I will say that this thing is about thrice as dangerous now!With the current state of Starsector Plus, I'm quite fond of my Summit-class.Good gravy, you've already salvaged a Tempy weapon? Good job!
I have a Templar Longinus Lance in it's Medium Slot! Everything else is just PD.
...also saw some vanilla ships mounting Templar weapons.Yeah same here. Scared the CRAP out of me when I went up against lasher with TWO of those missile racks...
The only obvious armament on Slave I was a pair of twin blasters which appear to have had a rather limited arc, being more or less fixed in any direction aside from the vertical; the original trilogy does not provide any evidence for a greater armament. Attack of the Clones additionally shows a pair of concealed forward-firing missile launchers midway down the pylon holding the blasters, a mine chute between thruster vents, and a couple of concealed forward-firing lasers just below and to either side of the cockpit, roughly where the pylon joins the main body of the ship. The expanded universe modifies the concealed armament of Slave I as used by Boba Fett, replacing the missile launchers and lasers with an ion cannon and a missile launcher in place of the lasers, a tractor beam and a pair of proton torpedo launchers at the end of the pylon, and apparently nothing in the location where the concealed missiles from Attack of the Clones had been.One thing about the fact that the landing pad wasn't damaged was that it could have been set up to absorb large amounts of thermal energy without any problems. After all, without that set up you would have to worry about the landings and take offs from all of the excessive heat
It's also a little difficult to compare the power of the weapons of Slave I relative to those of the Millenium Falcon. The concealed lasers on Slave I were shown to be inadequate to seriously damage Kenobi's Delta-7 with the hits it scored, whereas the Millenium Falcon's quad lasers regularly destroyed TIE Fighters with a hit or two, and the blasters at the end of Slave I's pylon were not shown used in an anti-fighter capacity and did no apparent damage to a landing pad when a different part of the same structure could be penetrated by what appeared to have been essentially a steel knife blade driven by Jango Fett's arm. Additionally, the blast resulting from the blaster fire impacting on the landing platform appeared roughly the same size as the blast which was produced by the jetpack-mounted rocket. On the other hand, the Delta-7 is a shielded fighter, unlike the TIE, and there's also a claim floating around that the TIE series made use of a highly unstable fuel as an explanation for the tendency of TIEs in the original trilogy to blow up when hit (though as far as I know this claim was never a canonical explanation).
Oh really? Well then, once I get lots of ships, I'll be sure to give it a try! Thank you for the hint!And if you keep the console enabled, you can turn dev mode on and off in game
